Wednesday, April 02, 2008


The Holy Name 6: The Young People Are Our Only Hope

Below is an e-mail message from Jeri L. Reed, mother of anti-war Iraq veteran Cody Camacho. She has some insightful things to say about the anti-war movement, the upcoming presidential elections, and she supports Holy Name 6. I wrote to Jeri and she confirmed that this was her work and gave me permission to repost it. To see my earlier post on the Holy Name 6 featuring photos of the Holy Name 6 and a video click here.

I stood out on the street Monday night with about fifteen others. Two members of the Oklahoma National Guard, one a member of Iraq Veterans Against the War, both about to deploy to Iraq. Another mother whose two sons have been in and out of Iraq and Afghanistan, one son is in the Green Zone right now. Safer? She worries that he is in the middle of Baghdad, in the middle of Iraq, surrounded by millions of Iraqis who could one day get sick and tired of the American occupation once and for all. A big supporter of IVAW who distributes their newsletter in his small Oklahoma town drove up from his farm to join us, his Marine son was killed in Iraq on September 6 last year, my birthday, he is my birthday soldier, which probably all of us have by now. We were supposed to be commemorating the death of the 4000th soldier in Iraq. But people weren't even honking any more like they used to. I'm sure a lot of people drove by thinking we were just foolish for even bothering. What’s another dead soldier in a sea of so many? What's another dead Iraqi?

We keep standing out there even though it really does not do much to end the occupations. I wouldn't know what else to do, when my son rolled across the Iraq border five years ago on March 21, 2003, it became my eternal responsibility to do something, even if it seemed hopeless, which it does. But maybe that is what a lot of people think—why bother? We are powerless to end this war, so why try? Better to just ignore it and keep our minds elsewhere. A lot of people have turned their attention to electoral politics, putting their faith into one of the dismal presidential candidates. At the same time, I have not talked to anyone who really believes that any of the candidates will actually end the war in Iraq, and of course, few people think to consider Afghanistan at all.

But some small events have given me hope, actions that have been criticized by others as rash and disruptive. Actions by young people guided by their passion and certainty that the occupation of Iraq is a crime against humanity that needs to stop immediately, by their youthful disbelief that such things could take place and no one would do anything to stop them. On Easter Sunday, six young people, members of a street theater group called Catholic Schoolgirls Against the War, entered the services at Holy Name Cathedral in Chicago and staged a die-in, they spread fake blood around, right in the aisle in the middle of respectable parishioners there to quietly hear the mass, not be reminded of the atrocities happening thousands of miles away. They yelled out "Even the Pope calls for peace!" and lay down in the aisles as if dead. They vocally objected to the priest, Cardinal George, meeting with a known war criminal, George W. Bush. They were arrested, and face felony charges for their actions, bail was set at $25,000 for five of them, $35,000 for Donte Smith allegedly due to a previous arrest at the School of the Americas, they are presently all free after putting up $16,000 of borrowed money. It made me so glad; it gave me so much hope. I was so proud of them.

Angela Haban
Mercedes Phiniah

Reagan Maher
Ryane Ziemba

Donte Smith
Ephron Ramirez, Jr.

Because if anyone thinks, after five years of this outrage, after one horrible year of my son invading another country and helping to wreak havoc and death and destruction, after a year of him being mortared almost daily, wading through depleted uranium which is like the ticking time bomb of our lives, after two years of trying to help him deal with the after effects to no avail, which of course we are supposed to keep to ourselves so as not to disturb others and simply smile and go about our normal lives which are not normal, after filing for bankruptcy the first year and continuing to sink money I don’t have into fighting this war, we all do, those of us affected, our cards if we still have them are maxed out, we don’t pay our bills. After sharing the pain of hundreds of other families and soldiers for five years, of all of those friends whose kids did not return from Iraq or Afghanistan, of all of those members of Iraq Veterans Against the War who despite the fact that they must deal with their own deep injuries physical and mental are courageously willing to put themselves on the line, even if they are active duty, even if they are in Iraq. Saying nothing of course about the tens of thousands of dead and wounded Iraqis and Afghanis or the lives they must lead in devastated nations, the fear that they live with daily, the sorrow and anguish they face daily. If anyone thinks that after all of this pain and death and disruption and destruction of our lives and the lives of all the people in Iraq and Afghanistan I care if Easter Mass at Mayor Daley’s church was disrupted by six young people with fake blood and cries for an end to this atrocity, they would be wrong. Good. I hope they do it some more. They are our hope.

I’m just saying that because I was looking for updates on the Holy Name 6, the name they have acquired, and ran across a message board, a generally anti-war message board made up of “progressive” Democrats, where opinion seems to be running against them, how dare they, on Easter Sunday yet, disrupt a church service. The innocent parishioners should have been allowed to enjoy their Easter in peace, to think of peace, perhaps to pray for it, then head to their homes for nice Easter dinners with their families. There were children present after all. They were scared.

There are children in Iraq. They are scared. They are wounded. They die. They have needed us to end this occupation for five years. They needed us to stop the invasion before it began. We failed. None of us are innocent. If our young people are willing to take risks to try to shock some compassion and concern into the American public who would rather look the other way and spend their time on football scores rather than thinking about the number of dead Americans and Iraqis and Afghanis, we need to support them. This is our hope, sedate crowds of marching old people have failed, devoted prayers of peace have failed, polite conversations with spineless and lying politicians have failed.

The action at Holy Name last Sunday is not the only sign of hope. Earlier this month at the University of Alabama, members of Iraq Veterans Against the War and Students for a Democratic Society were arrested for staging a mock incident between soldiers and Iraqis in one of the university’s buildings. Recreating the day-to-day behavior of soldiers in Iraq towards Iraqi citizens was simply too alarming for those nearby, or in the words of the dean of students, it was disruptive and wrong because it was “mimicking a true emergency.” This IS a true emergency.

Students at the University of Iowa recently made Karl Rove very unwelcome after he was paid $40, 000 to speak there. Not only did a couple hundred students disrupt the speaking event, they surrounded the restaurant where Rove ate dinner later, calling for him to “come out with his hands up” over a bullhorn, attempting to make a citizens' arrest of this notorious war criminal, causing him to delay his exit for quite a while.

At a “teach in” near the University of North Texas a few weeks ago, I listened to students talk about ideas for actions, much of it taken from the pages of history. Members of a new SDS chapter like those springing up on campuses around the country were present. I found myself wanting to interrupt; some of the ideas sounded too much like the ideas of 20-year-old college students for me, because they were. I stopped myself from criticizing. It is all right for us to share wisdom. It is not all right to stifle our young people in this hopeless situation. We cannot tell them what to do. We have no grounds. We have failed.

Two weeks ago, Tina Richards spent the evening waiting at the juvenile facility in Washington DC for the release of her fourteen year old daughter who had been arrested blocking a street while chanting "Arrest Bush, not kids!" as part of the Stop-Loss Congress actions, along with many young people who descended on our nation’s capitol for what they called Our Spring Break. This was Chrissy’s second arrest. With two other young women, she was held for hours in a cell smeared with human feces and male bodily fluids, while the arresting officer kept trying to intimidate them, trying to scare them. They sang instead, they emerged with shining eyes and smiling faces, these three girls. They were proud of themselves and they should have been. And Chrissy was ready to do it again. This is personal to Chrissy, along with her mother she has had to deal with the problems of her brother Cloy, a former Marine, now disabled with PTSD. She has had to stand by her mother as Cloy collapsed further and further after returning from Iraq, to the point where he called Tina and told her he was holding a gun to his mouth. Chrissy’s life is permanently disrupted; I don’t think she cares whether the rest of the country feels her pain.

I can remember how I felt when I was young, just realizing how the world really worked, I remember my shock and disbelief, my anger and my passion, and my belief that I could help change things. I think of things that I did that I would not do now, things that seem rash and dangerous. It is easy to look at the alleged excesses of the 60s and 70s with a critical eye, looking at the actions of so many young people then, the actions of ourselves. Some of them were misguided; some of them just did not work out the way they were planned. These were not things done by people who worried about their personal safety or the long-term repercussions of their actions. But then again, the Vietnam War ended and people of color in this country got more rights. None of this happened because people quietly prayed it away or went to the polls and elected the “right” people. Nothing has ever really changed in this country because people followed the rules and did the right thing and did not disturb others.

We live in the most powerful nation in the world with the biggest stockpile of weapons of mass destruction, run by people who are murderers and torturers and thieves. Most of us acknowledge that we are ruled by murderers and torturers and thieves, mainly because they don’t even bother to keep it from us. You could not bring enough buttons reading “Arrest Bush and Cheney” or the ever popular t-shirt “Arrest Cheney First” into the state of Oklahoma to satisfy demand. Yet no one seems willing to do anything about it. They don’t want to disrupt their lives. When the bombs started dropping on Baghdad on March 19, 2003, then my son drove into Iraq two days later, I knew we had failed. We had not been willing to disrupt our lives to stop this; I had not been willing to disrupt my own life enough even to prevent my own son from participating in these atrocities. I have always thought, what we should have done was shut down the whole country to stop it, no matter what.

None of the actions listed involved any kind of violence; they merely caused a lot of disruption and inconvenience for surrounding people, watch the video if you want to see what the Holy Name 6 actually did. None of these small incidents by themselves did much to end the war. But one can only hope that they are sparks. One can only hope. And if our young people decide that they simply do not want a future like this, that they do not want to give their silent assent to war crimes and war criminals as most of the country is doing, if they decide to disrupt the whole country to end this, to do what we have not been willing to do, we don’t need to criticize them, we need to support them. Or join them.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wading through depleted uranium -- well, I guess you can use a little poetic license for effect, but this stuff gets out around the world and there is no depleted uranium to wade through and this mother is completely wrong in that regard. DU was used to kill Iraqi tanks in the Gulf War and during the drive to Baghdad in 2003. It has probably not been used since because it is only good for one thing, killing tanks. The bulk of any dust that occured when the DU penetrator pierced the tank's armor and spontaneously burned because to the frictional heat is found within the tank. The remainder is found close by, no more than a few meters from the tank. There are no vast clouds of DU dust anywhere, not in Iraq, not floating over the Middle East, not anywhere. The proof is in the international scientific research that was done in Boznia-Herzegovina and in Kuwait. In Kuwait, they deliberately blew DU containing sand high into the air to see how far it would travel. They found it travelled a very short distance and this was deliberately blown far higher than DU would have been blown when a tank exploded as a result of being hit by a DU penetrator. While the anti-DU crusaders who fill the net with falsehoods may know that this information is really true, they do not want the moms on the front line to know that. Just like they try to make you think that 73,000 Gulf War veterans have died when the actual report that they reference indicates that during the 7 year period of the report that 4,312 male and 194 female Gulf War veterans died from all causes, including accident and old age. Yes, I am tired of people lying about DU - I am afraid that these lies will come back and haunt us when some as yet unborn Arab kid decides to get even with the US for poisoning his country forever when that never really happened.

Go here to learn more about DU -- and also click on the links in this DUStory at Yahoo Groups message - I referenced the UNEP Report in Boznia-Herzegovina and the IAEA Report on Kuwait, but there are a number of good solid factual links here -- -- this other link gives you a way to read the files section and learn a bit about Douglas Lind Rokke, aka Doctor Rokke (bet you did not realize that the doctorate is in Vocational Education or the thesis title is "Perceived physics concepts needed to teach secondary technology education as general education") aka Major Rokke (bet you did not know that First Lieutenant Rokke, US Army Reserve was the one who sat out the Gulf War in the HQ in Riyadh and that Major Rokke did not pin on his oak leaves until about 10 years later! and no, he is not a "disabled combat veteran" because you need to actually be in combat to merit that august title and respect), Leuren K Moret, self-described "independent scientist" who goes around the world bad mouthing the United States with false claims that DU is poisoning India, etc. - in reality, besides being articulate and mouthy from Berkeley and having graduated in 1968 with a degree in Geology, she is not really a "scientist" and has no knowledge whatsoever of radiation, radiation measurement (but she sure can put on a good act like she did on Hawaiian TV), uranium or depleted uranium, but she goes around the world as the international scientific expert because some idiot put her on as a witness in a kangaroo court. Anyway, you can see the documents that people like Rokke and Moret, etc. don't want you to see in the Files Section by following the instructions in . Welcome to the world of the curious who really want to know, not just parrot what they have heard.
It is interesting that from a piece with over 2,000 words you seized upon the one clause that mentions depleted uranium: "wading through depleted uranium which is like the ticking time bomb of our lives." And, of course, as you acknowledge, a bit of license was taken here and, yet, you still feel compelled to state that Ms. Reed is "completely wrong." All of which hints at an agenda.

Now agendas are okay, we all probably have them but it would be nice to know if you are an employee of the military-industrial complex. Are you, rhotel1, a US Air Force officer named Roger Helbig? Interested readers can check the following links to learn more about LTC Helbig and his DU work:

Any way, you mention a report by the UNEP. I went to their DU web site and found a flyer on "DU Awareness" (link below). It says, in part:

DU is a toxic heavy metal
* DU is chemically toxic, as is naturally occurring uranium,
* it is a heavy metal,
* the toxic effect depends on the amount taken into the body,
* the kidney is the most sensitive organ to uranium poisoning,
* the chemical toxicity of uranium leads to strong effects (poisoning) within hours or days after body contamination,
* radiological effects may occur after years.

DU is radioactive
DU emits three types of ionising radiation: alpha, beta and
gamma. Exposure to radiation from DU:
* can be external (mainly by close contact of DU to the skin),
* can be internal (by inhalation or ingestion) and
* may result in increased risk of cancer. The magnitude of
risk depends on the part of the body exposed (particularly
the lungs through inhalation) and on the radiation dose.

Elsehere, the flyer says:

Precautionary steps
* Do not enter known DU targeted
sites prior to site decontamination.
* If entry is necessary, wear personal protective equipment (PPE) including rubber boots, gloves and as a minimum a dust mask. ...
* Effects of DU can be long-term with the resuspension of paricles and groundwater contamination. Therefore, local authorities should monitor the site on a regular basis.

It also says:

The United Nations Environment
Programme (UNEP) has been conducting environmental measurements on targeted DU
sites in Kosovo in 2000, Serbia and
Montenegro in 2001, and Bosnia
and Herzegovina in 2002. In addition, UNEP was involved in the
IAEA DU assessment to Kuwait in
the spring of 2002. All these studies confirm that DU has environmental impacts. Health risks primarily depend on the awareness of people coming into contact with
DU. Radiological and chemical effects of DU are likely to occur only under worst-case scenarios. UNEP DU reports always recommend precautionary action such as, measurements, signing, fencing and
clean-up of the targeted sites to
avoid possible health risks.

It seems to me that many parts of Iraq and Afghanistan are probably "worst-case scenarios" with people living "on targeted DU sites" without much in the way "measurements, signing, fencing and
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?